Skroutz.eu

Positive:
+ A mid-range phone that easily surpasses the Samsung a52s in terms of power.
+ Good photography even in low light. Since I have been using Nikon cameras for decades, no mobile phone impresses me, but it performs well in case of emergency.
+ Battery lasts an average of 2 days for me, does not easily drain with use.
+ Waterproof, charger, etc. are known from the specifications.

Negative:
- 424€ on offer is relatively high for a mid-range phone. At least I had an additional small discount from the credit card and I also cut the invoice.
- Long and narrow, like unfortunately almost all phones, makes it difficult for anyone who wants to use it for work, reading, etc.
- Contrary to usage, battery management in standby mode is average. On the second night, it can lose more than 15% of the remaining charge, although this may not matter much to most people.
- Cases are currently not... I bought a transparent case and a tempered glass from the island (ebay.co.uk) for 9.34€ including shipping and VAT.

Easy installation following the instructions. It connected easily even to the router, although I personally recommend wireless connection only if someone really needs it.
We empty the color inks completely by filling the cartridges, the black ink is left over and there is also a second black ink.
Until 31-07 there was a €30 cashback, the bank takes about €3 as a transfer fee. Warranty extension to 3 years, it continues until 04-2024.
It is intended for amateur use, it loads the paper from the top and takes a while to start the first print of the day, but it serves me well as a second machine in the office. A color laser multifunction printer would start from €300, while for medium quality and above the cost increases even more. Probably the combination of a black and white laser printer for the main printing volume with this multifunction printer for a second (and color) printer and scanner excels in terms of economy and reliability. The obvious drawback is that I have at least 2 printers connected and 4 cables at the back...

Usually used as an outdoor portrait lens mainly with the D7200. Equivalent to approximately 129mm on a crop sensor, compared to Canon's 137-138mm (it has a smaller crop sensor). Sometimes desirable, sometimes restrictive.

Pros:
Excellent sharpness, sufficient even for the D810.
Very good separation from the background and bokeh.
Accurate color reproduction.
Low price, although it has had significant fluctuations, purchased for 450-455 euros, went up to 560 and gradually stabilized. Includes lens hood.
Almost no coma in night shots.
Accurate focusing, speed is just satisfactory.

Cons:
Chromatic aberrations (longitudinal), especially when there is a bright sky in the background. It is best to avoid such portrait shots, although this applies to some extent to all non-apochromatic lenses.

Now, regarding a previous comment, what can I say about skin rendering. Canon has a "rosy" setting on sensors intended for amateur use. In professional models, it stops producing pinkish tones and the color performance is not distinguishable from Nikon and other manufacturers. Also, the Canon 85mm 1:1.8 (as well as other older EF lenses) focuses much better with expensive Canon bodies, but its sharpness is now borderline. It is more than sufficient for cheaper bodies, but it loses accuracy in focusing. I apologize for commenting on another lens, but let's not let inaccuracies float around.

Recently installed on a mid 2010 MacBook Pro, I had decided long ago to replace its hard drive (a Hitachi HDD 320GB) with a 500GB SSD, but kept putting it off. Finally, a month ago, I was in a rush to open the Zoom application to attend a webinar, but Zoom requested an update and then took forever to open. With my kids hovering over me, I slapped the MacBook while it was running, and that was the end of the old hard drive.

My MacBook normally requires side screws for stability, but I used the included bracket and added a protective adhesive (for furniture, etc.) on top. I formatted it to work and then reinstalled the latest operating system that the computer had (MacOS High Sierra). Obviously, I didn't need a copying program, so I have no opinion on that. Of course, it operates at SATA II speeds, which it reaches, with about 270 read and 250-255 write with the Blackmagic test. The computer opens and operates normally in 15-16 seconds, whereas before it would take longer.

Five stars from me, hoping to justify its reputation and the five-year warranty.

Purchase in early January 2012, around 180-185 euros. Mainly used on DX sensor, on the D90 for the longest time and now on the D7500, but also (less so) on Full Frame, D750 and D810. In DX, it corresponds to approximately 76mm and is probably the top cheap portrait lens from all companies, while also being a very good general-purpose lens for FX and DX (in DX mainly for outdoor use as a small telephoto lens).
I have experience with its predecessor, the 50mm 1:1.8D. The AF-S, although more expensive, excels in my opinion in the following:
1) Sharper at wide apertures both in the center (slightly more) and mainly in the rest of the frame.
2) Bokeh clearly better and generally exceptional for its price category.
3) Coma very mild at the limits of the small sensor, which personally interests me for night shots. However, in FX, coma is still present even at 1:2.8.
4) Autofocus. It has a built-in motor, so the lens focuses almost silently and works with the D3xxx and D5xxx series, but the speed is similar (good). The big difference lies in the accuracy of autofocus, where the old one lags behind significantly (the cheap 50mm from Canon is even worse).
5) Practically no glare - flare, making the lens hood almost unnecessary.

Additionally, the lens is more than sufficient for FX, especially for the sensor of the D750. On the D810, it needs to be stopped down to at least 1:2.5 or 2.8 for more acceptable results.
And a comment on a previous review. Using a lens at its maximum aperture for portraits is the responsibility of the photographer and a matter of technique to focus correctly, i.e. on the eyes or the eye that is closest to the lens. And indeed, the nose and possibly the other eye may be out of focus.

The lens is periodically sold with cashback at 190-200 euros (or even lower), so I suggest not paying 240+ euros if you can wait a bit.