Skroutz.eu

I have a weakness for cordless vacuum cleaners due to my maisonette. I have bought several. I had the ROHNSON MAMBA PRO and I am very satisfied, and I thought to buy another one, but more economical. This particular one is unacceptably cheap in construction. Its plastics are of very poor quality, and they have nothing to do with the other one I already had. In my personal opinion, choose another one, because here it applies what we say, you get what you pay for.

I should say that due to having a maisonette, I have bought a rechargeable vacuum for each floor. The SHARK is the latest one I purchased and I should note it is the most expensive. I am disappointed and regret my purchase. It has weight in the hand, making it very difficult for me to maneuver. The base keeps lifting up, and I have to constantly press it down with my foot for it to go down and vacuum. On thicker carpets, the base does not glide despite the fact that it has suction and picks up small debris when I lift it and place it on them. In short, to not bore you. I would not buy it again; there are better and more economical options. I would get two Rohnson Mamba Pros that I already have for this price. The only practical feature is its self-cleaning. I believe we should evaluate everything we buy and help each other in the right direction.

You get what you pay for. I thought I would buy an affordable one this time, and I believe now that it’s only suitable for kids. Slow, without intensity, and few rotations.

I have changed many multi-processors. This one is the quietest I have ever had and at the same time grinds everything easily. Value for money purchase.

The makeup is not the Dream Satin as mentioned in the description, it has been discontinued and I can't find it anywhere. They send the Radiant in its place which looks similar in shade, but it has a completely different texture and coverage.

The bucket is so narrow that when it fills up, you can't take out the bag. Mediocre quality plastics