Skroutz.eu

Just what I needed for my LG from a decade ago. The buttons have the same layout as the original. It does its job perfectly.

Content:
Currently, the game has 20 maps and over 100 weapons, as well as body-to-body combat equipment/weapons (so ignore the reviews that say "there is no content"). There are about 20 tanks and 15 planes in the game, as well as smaller ships, landing craft, troop transports, etc. Additionally, there is a plethora of decorative items that are not overly distracting or detract from the gaming experience.

Game:
The game has encountered about 3 serious errors during its 2+ years, and they have all been fixed. There are minor errors with virtually no impact that you will encounter in about 1 in 25 games, but such errors can be found in any game as complex and extensive as this one.

Accuracy:
The game was advertised from the beginning to focus on lesser-known parts of the war, rather than the same 3 or 4 parts that every other World War II game has covered, and it does exactly that. It takes you to places you may have never heard of and exposes you to so many new areas of the war, giving someone the opportunity to learn some new historical facts. This is where the game received a lot of criticism, as people were upset that the game didn't solely focus on:
a. The US in Japan (which was added) and
b. Russia in Germany (they just wanted another COD WWII/World at War type campaign).

As for the scenery, weapons, and vehicles, they are all authentic and accurate, with so many small details that many people overlook.

Service:
DICE has provided the most consistent stream of new content the series has ever had, all for free for the first time, instead of locked behind paid DLC. Unfortunately, DICE listened to the vocal minority too much and changed some aspects of the game based on their complaints, to which they complained even more. The live service has now been announced to end in June, as the company believes the game will never satisfy its players. While the vocal minority would never be satisfied (as they often contradicted themselves), the majority of players enjoyed and continue to enjoy the game.

I would highly recommend buying the game, as I am sure it can be found quite cheap now and you can try it out for yourself, it is very likely that you will enjoy it.

Very good fabric but narrow fit. The fit is perfect for at least slightly toned body otherwise the look won't be liked. I would buy it again

Well guys, in a few words, I bought it with the intention of using my computer screen as a monitor for the PS5 and it works great under basic conditions.

We need to understand that the device accepts input up to 1080p under ideal conditions. So we need to lower the settings of the PS5 BEFORE connecting it to the PC.

1) You need to adjust the image of the PS5 to the lowest resolution, 720p.

2) Connect the HDMI to the device and that to the PC.

3) Open the application you want. The Windows Camera and VLC worked perfectly for me.

4) Play on a 15" screen at a low resolution.

If there is any delay in the display, lower the quality or play with the input FPS.

It is a beautiful and comfortable backpack in general, but IT IS NOT WATERPROOF. With the recent rains, when I arrived home, half of the bag had held water inside.

Long story short, as they say in my village, the laptop, tablet, and notes that I had inside got destroyed. I read the reviews about it being waterproof and unfortunately trusted them. Yes, it may be suitable for going to the gym, but not for carrying it with you all day, especially with electronic devices inside.

The only alternative I can think of is if someone purchases a waterproof cover for the backpack along with it.

I bought 2 of the 2TB. One for the PS5 and one for the laptop. Simple things, guys. With 80 euros per piece, you get 2TB (1.8 to be exact). It's not a Samsung Pro, but it's fast. Very fast. Great value for money. GEN 4. And on the PS5 with the Be quiet MC1 cooler, you have as much space as you want. Don't go for a more expensive M.2, this one works for everything and it's worth it. I'm thinking of getting a third one and turning it into an external drive with a case. Time will tell the rest

I had never bought the Corepro series before. I am very satisfied with the performance (natural daylight color) and the intensity of the light. It was installed in a 25 sqm room. I calculated the intensity using the simplest formula (350lm per 10 sqm at least). The space is used for computer use and reading. Anyone who entered the room was amazed by the quality of the lighting. For me, it is an impeccable product. I will gradually buy the next ones to upgrade the space.

VFM. Light, simple, and elegant. It slightly increases water pressure, so hypothetically it also saves a little water. Its head is not wide, it has the regular size.

I bought it with the intention of increasing my productivity and to clean up my home office space, hoping to use it as two additional screens without the need for extra monitors, converters, and cables. I connected it in less than a minute and it quickly and easily connected to my laptop via HDMI, and it also has a USB TYPE-C port for those who support it (it also works with my wife's MacBook with TYPE-C). It takes about 5 minutes to install the LG application and make the desired settings. The program helps you pre-select the ways in which you want the screen to be divided. It also has its own speakers that receive audio from HDMI, which personally satisfies me as basic+ speakers for some music and video conferences.

Before I start talking about the pros and cons, I have one thing to say: SPEND TIME TO PROPERLY ADJUST THE COLORS AND BRIGHTNESS. The settings are not the same for everyone.

Text usage: I have used it with up to 4 screens, but the zoom was at around 60%, so it's not suitable for prolonged use. Usually, I have it split into 2 (120%) or 3 (100%) depending on what I'm doing. I'm referring to vertical splitting. The text is crystal clear and the screen doesn't strain your eyes, even with at least 5 hours of daily use with proper lighting (natural light and desk lamp). You can have PowerPoint, Chrome, Word, and whatever else you want open, and there is space for more.

Photo/video usage: Here I will say that the quality is not the best and it depends on the settings you make for the screen colors. In general, for the use I have (casual rendering and editing of photos and videos from a hobby drone), I consider it almost excellent. The biggest advantage is that I finally have the entire video timeline on one line without having to go left and right.

Gaming: Here things are different, guys. Very nice colors and relatively good response, but there is screen tearing in fast-paced FPS games. I'm talking about a GeForce1650 DDR5 4GB graphics card with 32GB of RAM. For example, it can play COD WARZONE at medium settings without any issues, but screen tearing rarely occurs.

Overall, it's worth its price at 300 and it's possibly one of the best all-around solutions. If you can spend an extra 200 euros, go for 4K for better results. I believe that 2K is not a worthwhile choice in the current market phase. The stand is adjustable, but it doesn't give you much space, and if you work with a laptop like me, you will need an additional monitor stand to raise it higher on the desk so that the laptop screen doesn't obstruct the bottom half of the monitor (see the photo and you will understand).