Good for Rendering/Multitasking applications and for streaming. On Windows, it doesn't understand anything. If you want a processor only for gaming and VFM, go for the 5600X. The difference in FPS is max 5-12% max and this difference "in some games."
Negatives: High temperatures as soon as it is stressed. Whether the game is demanding or you are decompressing a large .rar file, for example with very high compression, it reaches 88C easily. 89-90C in extreme bench stress. On the other hand, it is made for such temperatures, regardless of whether these scare us.
If you have time and want lower temperatures with the same or even better performance, it is the right time to experiment with Undervolt. Of course, many do not know, cannot, do not have the time, or simply do not want to. Fair enough, don’t even consider the 5800X.
Don’t read that with a good cooler it will run at normal temperatures. This processor needs UnderVolt - it is hot!!!
WARNING: I wrote this at the beginning. If it is only for gaming, really look for something else.
With Arctic Freezer II 360 with 6 fans 120mm on the radiator (push/pull configuration) and in a LianLi case with a total of 14 ARCTIC fans 120mm, it easily reaches 85C stock while gaming and of course with PBO disabled.
It is mounted on an ASUS RogStrix B550 E-Gaming costing €320 (not F), one of the 3 best B550 boards available: the best VRM, PWM controller, and many others. The reason I chose this expensive board is for stability in UnderVolt.
With Undervolt per Core, I reached a max of 74C (OCCT stress test 1h) and with better performance than stock. In all games, it did not exceed 76C. It was also tested with 3 other triple radiator AIOs (Coolermaster, Thermaltake, Raijintek). By far, the ARCTIC outperformed them all in temperatures and especially in noise levels.
** 20.06.2023 If you go for AIO, especially for this CPU, choose the ARCTIC LIQUID Freezer III or the new one from DeepCool. Also, with a little more money, if you can, consider the 5700X3D if you want to stay on AM4.