What the previous ones have said... Desperately slow at writing. I got it just to reach the amount so I wouldn't have to pay for shipping.

Depending on the use you want it for. It is very cheap for the GB it offers and in that regard, it is worth it. The reason it is cheap, however, is that it is very slow. What everyone says is true. Definitely not 3.2 speeds, it's closer to 2.0. If you want it for frequent file transfers, it doesn't work. If you just want it to store music for the car, it might work. However, there are logically better solutions.

Very slow speed, most of the time does not exceed 5 MB/s. At least misleading the USB 3.2 that the packaging writes.

After supporting the brand for 25+ years, bye bye Kingston

Desperately slow speeds. A Google search would have saved me, but I didn't do it before purchasing. It doesn't take more than two clicks to confirm how tragic it is in terms of speed. Slower than USB 2.0. A very bad purchase.

It has an okay read speed, but its write speed is below average at 3.2, meaning it writes at a steady rate of about 15MB/s. For its price, it's just okay. My old Sandisk is faster and it's USB 2

I expected higher read/write speeds due to USB 3.2, but unfortunately it writes at around 4-5 MB/s with consecutive drops to 500-600 KB/s, and reads at around 17-18 MB/s. The files I have are movies of about 2-3 GB. The data transfer is done between two computers that support USB 3.2 (ASUS Q408UG and Lenovo IdeaPad 3 17"). I connect it to an Android TV BOX for movie playback on a TV that does not have a built-in media player. For USB 3.2, which is advertised as "fast data transfer (20 Gbit/s) from previous versions when connected to a USB 3.2 port," I believe it does not help and does not reflect reality. I would recommend mentioning the actual read/write speeds in its specifications.