Reviews by our members

• 5

  5 out of 7 members found this review helpful

  stratos_ch

  2024-10-06

  Verified purchase

  Tested on a computer with the following specs:

  LG 27-inch monitor, at 1ms, 180 Hz, HDR, FHD.

  Motherboard: ASUS Prime A320M-K
  CPU: AMD Ryzen 7, 8-cores, at 3.40 GHz
  RAM: DDR4, 32 GB, 3200 MHz
  Windows 11 Pro 24H2
  SSD Samsung 500 GB (system)
  HDD Toshiba 2 TB (storage and gaming)

  Extra secondary monitor (not for gaming): Samsung Curve 27'' 75 Hz.

  Games are played on Ultra graphics, at a resolution of 1920x1080 and with HDR:

  Pubg, Call Of Duty, Need For Speed, Tom Clancy's, Ready or Not, Tomb Raider, Phasmophobia, HITMAN, Sniper Ghost, Bodycam, God of War, DayZ, Arma 3, Far Cry, Forza Horizon, Ghost Recon, Mortal Kombat, Metro, Left 4 Dead, and many more!

  It comfortably supports 180 Hz with HDR.
  The GPU Core reaches about 75% at maximum, while it is extremely rare for it to raise temperatures and it is never heard!
  The CPU during gaming does not exceed 40%. Usually, it is around 20-35%.

  Translated from Greek · Show original
  Did you find this review helpful?YesNo

  Report
• 5

  5 out of 7 members found this review helpful

  ioan_dragk

  2024-09-13

  Verified purchase

  For 1080p gaming with everything on high, you won't have any problems; at 1440p, it will struggle with the more demanding games. The 16GB definitely helps, and you can run some AI models as well. For 4K and/or ray tracing, I wouldn't recommend it; you would need to go to a much higher category. For around €300, it's a good purchase unless the prices of the 4060 drop further.

  Translated from Greek · Show original
  Did you find this review helpful?YesNo

  Report
• 5

  11 out of 13 members found this review helpful

  Μανώλης Πανόριος

  2024-06-22

  The card is purely for 1080p gaming at high graphics. It has future potential with the 16gb, at 1080p gaming it's somewhat unnecessary but in future titles they will prove useful compared to the non-xt version. The performance differences are not huge, with a 10% increase and a €100 difference compared to the 4060, they are almost the same in performance, with the 7600xt slightly superior in some areas and the 4060 in others, small differences though.

  However, I believe that in future AAA titles the 16gb will prove useful compared to the 8gb and that's where it wins the market.

  For 2k gaming, yes it will play all titles at good graphics and a minimum of 60fps. It's a card for 2024 so it will play, but in 3A games it will struggle. Anyone looking for 2k with high fps and prospects looks elsewhere, not here. What you pay for is what you get.

  Here you are at 1080p, all graphics maxed out and good fps

  Translated from Greek · Show original

  • Performance
  • Silent
  • Size
  • Temperature
  • Value for money

  • 
  • 
  Did you find this review helpful?YesNo

  Report
• 5

  5 out of 7 members found this review helpful

  Dimitris_Tzanopoulos

  2024-04-09

  Verified purchase

  At 330, I consider it an excellent purchase. It will not be used exclusively for gaming, but also for programs that require the above vram, otherwise there is the 4060 at a slightly better price. Of course, it seems that in new generation games that utilize the above memory (last of us remastered), the difference with 8gb is chaotic +25%. Of course, if you can find a 6700xt at the right price, it is a better overall choice. Its temperatures are very good and it is relatively quiet

  Translated from Greek · Show original

  • Performance
  • Silent
  • Size
  • Temperature
  • Value for money
  Did you find this review helpful?YesNo

  Report
• 

  4

  27 out of 28 members found this review helpful

  HARDWARE & GADGETS

  2024-02-21Expert user

  The only negative thing is the price. At 420-440, someone can get the 7700XT, which is on another level even with only 12GB of VRAM.

  However, as a card, considering it will drop to 250-300€ at most.

  Excellent implementation, low temperatures, and low power consumption. It can handle the majority of games at 1080p@120-165hz on High+ settings (I won't mention Starfield or Cyberpunk, as we all know how demanding those games are, and even higher-end cards struggle with them...!

  As a card, it is intended for 1080p and serves as an entry-level option for non-demanding games at 1440p@60 fps. With a bronze 650w PSU, you're good to go, especially with boosted memory and core clocks. I like that it's more compact and fits well in mini cases.

  The 16GB is not unnecessary if you have mods or do video editing. PCIe 4.0 with SAM+FSR+anti-lag technology are nice features that the company provides and you can take advantage of. It works great with a 5600+ B550 setup, but even with a 7600+ B650, you won't be disappointed with the more expensive system (I don't recommend 7850X3D or 5800X3D as those CPUs can handle higher resolutions and a better GPU like the 77/7800 XT).

  The only reason I wouldn't recommend it is the price... because the production of the 6700/6700XT/6750XT/6800/6800XT has significantly dropped their prices. Also, for just a little more, you can get the 7700XT Pulse...!!! If it drops to around 250+/- and you can't find any 6700/6800 series cards in this price range, then it's the sweet spot for gamers as it's only 10% more powerful than the 7600 non-XT. Also, if you don't want to stick with AMD, the RTX 4060 Ti 8GB is available for 355-385€, which competes with the RX 6700/6750/7700 XT. So, there definitely needs to be a significant price drop for someone to consider buying it...!

  I don't judge the card's performance as a card, but rather the cost of a 400€ purchase along with its performance. With 400€, you can find an upper-level GPU (4060 Ti/7700 XT). It also doesn't handle Ray Tracing well. Unfortunately, even the 4060 is better with its 8GB in Ray Tracing... in terms of raw ultra settings high framerate performance, it's very good (as long as the price drops). However, it won't disappoint its users/buyers (see 6500 XT)

  Translated from Greek · Show original

  more

  • Performance
  • Silent
  • Size
  • Temperature
  • Value for money
  Did you find this review helpful?YesNo

  Report
• 5

  1 out of 1 members found this review helpful

  Panos_Sotiropoulos946

  2024-06-04

  Verified purchase

  good value for the mid range

  • Performance
  • Silent
  • Size
  • Temperature
  • Value for money
  Did you find this review helpful?YesNo

  Report
• 5

  KOSTAS_PAPADOPOULOS51

  2025-02-05

  Verified purchase

• 5

  GREEN_GAMERS

  2024-10-17

  Verified purchase

• 5

  dagresk2506

  2024-10-08

  Verified purchase

• 5

  oldboy13

  2024-09-24

  Verified purchase

• 5

  spyrosdja

  2024-06-27

  Verified purchase

• 5

  George_Kiranis

  2024-06-25

  Verified purchase