The comparative approach of A. Papadiamantis and F. Dostoevsky highlights the free will of the authors in the management of religious discourse. In their literary work, dogmatic religious discourse is annulled and replaced by social-religious discourse, which is transformed into a worldly revolutionary critique. Their language incorporates different social and political readings, balancing individual intention with social cohesion, in direct connection with religious perfection. The impasse of social relations, injustice, anger, and contempt are externalized as reality and transformed into meanings - constructs, naturalized situations in the course of life. Nature, man, and community harmonize in earthly life, simultaneously gazing at the divine as a rational presence, lawful empowerment, and pragmatic justification.